Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Duluth Metals Ltd DULMF



GREY:DULMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by junior_mineron Sep 04, 2009 3:25pm
379 Views
Post# 16279963

RE: RE: RE: Losing some steam

RE: RE: RE: Losing some steamPolymet has been moving nicely lately. Anything that's good for them is good for us. People will realize eventually.$0$0$0$0POM operating costs except mining would be quite comparable to DM's. Same type of ore, same hydromet process. If their number are accepted, so should be DM's. $12/t mining is quite acceptable estimate. Situation for long hole stoping does not get better than this: Rock is very compentent. Mineralization is has ~50 meters vertical lenght. Mineralization is continuous. $0$0$0$0$0DM is far bigger, lower cost, larger production than POM. Capex is no problem just look at the IRR at any imageable metal price scenario. $0$0$0$0
Bullboard Posts