Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Artaflex Inc V.ATF



TSXV:ATF - Post by User

Comment by jackbnimbleon Sep 21, 2009 8:49am
160 Views
Post# 16323490

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ''Passenger Vlodinger

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: ''Passenger VlodingerWormbuster: I am not challenging, I am questioning.

I am trying to understand how two virtually similar companies, operating with the same strategy in the same industry could have such dramatically different results:

in 7 years:

-IEC has gone from $0.07/share to $5.40/share
-ATQ has gone from $0.40/share to $0.10/share.

I think the results beg for an understanding of the differences such that corrective action can be immediately taken. Perhaps you are happy with the 40 year drought of the Maple Leafs but I am not. What are the best practices in the industry. What are IEC and LB doing right and what has ATQ been doing that is wrong.

That is what is needed and that is what has not been happening at the board level. Now with a big activist stakeholder, it is finally going to happen.

And that can only be a good sign.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>