RE: RE: RE: RE: Some thoughtstalkswitch is right in that the litigation, if it goes forward, would likely be long and bloody and very very costly both in terms of legal fees and in terms of the delay that a court would cause in any mine development if something like an injunction were granted pending court resolution.
The more likely scenario is that a settlement will be reached beforehand - junior miners are usually not very interested in pursuing long legal battles - the world is in the here and now.
As for merits of the case, unless you review the contract and the obligations each side had under it, then its likely anything you say is pure guesswork. Golden Eagle likely had specific obligations under its contract - if, as YNG asserts, it violated those obligations it was in breach of the contract. However, those contracts usually provide for a notice period and a cure period in which the breaching party has some time to cure their default. Golden Eagle asserts that it was notified of the termination of the contract with 3 hours notice. If that's true then YNG will have terminated inproperly and will be liable for something, but what and how much is anyone's guess.
I doubt that based on how acid this relationship has become that any judge would order the contract to go ahead - YNG as owner and Golden Eagle as operator - it would be untenable. Damages, if any, will be the order of the day.