GREY:SLKEF - Post by User
Comment by
whaleron Oct 06, 2009 12:08pm
207 Views
Post# 16366306
RE: RE: RE: Finally the 43-101 on sedar
RE: RE: RE: Finally the 43-101 on sedarAppendix K:
Hey did you notice that Activation Lab's reassaying had/has consistently shown their Ni values to be higher than Swastika in most samples I have scanned?
Start on page 184 with the LN05-2 sample stream right up to LN08-118. After LN08-118 to LN08-150 (pg 197)we do not have Activation labs info, only Swastika....so can we assume Swastika is shy on the Ni?? Those last holes are the deep drilling exploratory holes
Our last official drill results release (Mar 02.09) shows drilling up to LN08-148 and that hole "was planned at the same setup but not drilled"
Appendix M (Page 205) for Langmuir 1 much the same most Nickel values showing higher for Activation labs over the past Swastika labs assays. L105-1 thru L108-118
Wow........so what does that do for the resource calc? Hye I sure hope James Darcel gets an update he would like to see these results. The extra assay values for PGM credits should make mining interesting IMHO