Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

GETT Gold Inc V.GETT

Alternate Symbol(s):  RCCMF

G.E.T.T Gold Inc. is a Canada-based company engaged in the exploration and the development of gold resources in Quebec. The Company also has an exclusive license for the Thermal Fragmentation mining method. The Company holds one mining property, named Courville. The Company’s project, Courville-Maruska, is situated in Courville Township, approximately 30 kilometers north-east of Val-d’Or. It has a total area of about 6.02 square kilometers and comprises 14 CL and one designated claim. The Company uses thermal fragmentation technology as a mining method, which extracts narrow vein deposits. It is focused on the development and widespread implementation of a patented thermal fragmentation mining method. The Company offers services to extract ore and/or making openings in the rock.


TSXV:GETT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Power1on Oct 07, 2009 9:15am
236 Views
Post# 16368953

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Here's the original Deal

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Here's the original Deal
Sorry. My bad.  Less shares to achieve the same price.  The next point I guess would be to say there is a strong correalation between the share price and and agreed upon pruchase price and that is why the rights are being secured for such a nominal investment. 

I'm not bashing here.  Just expressing my frustration and opinion.  I will comment no further and solict the views of other shareholders as I may be looking at this all worng.    What's your thoughts people?


Bullboard Posts