Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

YAN:CA V.YAN



TSXV:YAN - Post by User

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Post by Tumbleweed67on Oct 10, 2009 2:06am
627 Views
Post# 16379292

DOOM & GLOOM

DOOM & GLOOMI wonder if the reaction would have been different if the NR hadn't used the expression "under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act"? Having read their NR realease a couple of times, it would seem they are setting themselves up to continue functioning for the foreseeable future, as long as they can get approval for the entire plan. HeII, they even expect to be able to sell $500k of shares for a minimum of 5 cents each, double today's price. Assuming, of course, they are able to get everyone's approval, the real issue I see is a pretty major dilution of shares. Perhaps that is what the market reaction was to? But it's money already owed anyway, right? It would be nice to know more about this Athabaska Energy in terms of what assets it brings to the table, and how many shares YAN is going to be replacing (more dilution).
The solution they are proposing seems much better than their June 19 NR: "The Company will list and sell assets commencing September 1, 2009, as needed to generate cash for debt reduction." Selling assets is never good for shareholders.
Seeing as the BoD currently holds over 40% of the O/S, and there does not seem to have been a single sell by any of them, they must believe this is going to work. I don't think the captain really goes down with the ship these days, does he? For 2.5 cents, I'll take the chance their right.

GLTA
TW
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse