Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Douglas Lake Minerals Inc DLKM



GREY:DLKM - Post by User

Comment by AU_NBon Oct 26, 2009 10:24pm
231 Views
Post# 16425977

RE: RE: Gold deposits beg for capital

RE: RE: Gold deposits beg for capital
MyStockhouse/Default.aspx?u=3167163"" href="javascript:void(0);">Yukon_Cornelius

I think it indicates market valuation per ounce of the undeveloped, proven deposit.. ie. value of gold in-the-ground which has not been developed or fully developed, not income to the operator. It does not represent a stream of income.

There is a large differential between market price of refined gold (over $1000/oz) and the value the market pays per ounce for a specific property not yet producing ( or perhaps even producing) the ounces of the defined, "proven" resource. What would be of interest to us, I think, is the price the market pays per ounce for an "in-the-ground" proven property. Perhaps some of the listed companies are in limited production, but the analysis does not appear to rely on such production, if any. And other minor properties are disregarded as per asterisk.

The $57.88 figure comes from the second chart down, (SELECTED "TOP ACQUISITION" TARGETS). It appears to consider market price per share, "value"(total market capitalization of the stock expressed in millions of $US or fraction thereof , I believe), size of deposit, and it results in the average per ounce market valuation. Range is from $4.40 to $433.35 per in-the-ground ounce. What is not shown is number of shares outstanding for each listed company, which would be necessary to calculate the market capitalization figure ("value"). I would attribute the differences between the market value for different deposits to be the results of anticipated cost to produce, access, security, other factors, etc. Crystallex, for example is not located in a stable political location and security appears to be a major problem.

"Value" (market capitalization) appears to be divided by number of ounces in the "proven" deposit of each stock and then the decimal is adjusted to units of Dollars from millions. (Crystallex: 0.074 dollars (expressed as a fraction of million) divided by 16.90 = .0004378. Adjusted to Dollars (units) = $4.38 (close to $4.40; why the difference I can't explain).
Taking Novagold as another example. 1.028 divided by 14.70 = 0.0699319. Adjusted = 69.93.)


The adjusted market valuation for each of the 43 stock listed is totaled and then averaged to yield $57.88 ( may be slightly off as shown above). So, consider it a ballpark figure.


Just my understanding

ICBW
dyodd

https://www.mineweb.co.za/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page33?oid=91112&sn=Detail#

[article courtesy of Siempre 33.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>