RE: RE: FRAUD? - Class ActionFraud according to Wikipedia:
In the broadest sense, a
fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and is also a
civil law violation. Many hoaxesare fraudulent, although those not made for personal gain are nottechnically frauds. Defrauding people of money is presumably the mostcommon type of fraud, but there have also been many fraudulent"discoveries" in art,
archeaology, and science.
Someone committed fraud, it would appear. No one seemed to have gained from it. It does seem odd that someone with that level of experience would not expect the 43-101 author to not perform some level of data audit, which appears to be how this was caught.
I was hoping the initially reported higher grade intercepts would give us a higher resource grade than next door Armistace. The bonanza grades will probably be cut for the coming resource calculation as statistical anomalies.
Class action against the company still, or just the fraudster?!?!?