Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

logic 101

[curtisprod]

Now Huttani, please, you are starting to lose your kooolll.  I've e always treated you respectfully.  We may disagree but there is no need to get emotional.

For those of you who may be aware of what (I believe) is going on, let me explain.

FACT: Many shareholders are upset because the price of REV remains at these pathetic levels.  I generally concur.
FACT: Many shareholders are upset because of the lack of communication between REV and their shareholders.
            I generally concur.
FACT:Some shareholders believe that the current CEO should be removed and replaced by Wolf of Eurogas.
           At this point, I do not concur

WHY I DO NOT AGREE:  The current management has arranged this deal, JV with respected FNCC and United.
           We are mid-stream in testing and presenting this product.   (My Speculation and rumor/DD) FNCC is
           presenting this project to the MAJOR oil companies in Canada.  There is interest!  They must test and check
          results.  IF it is positive, (IF) then there will be a demand for this product and REV will be sitting on a lucrative
          property. Our SP will shoot up.  Therefore, in my opinion it would be foolish to change management at this
          point  especially since so many business today are conducted on a personal relationship which has (in our
         case), already been established. 

WHY THERE IS A CALL FOR CHANGE:
        (My Speculation and rumor/DD)  Imagine this scenario.  One company A owes another company B millions in
        dollars and shares.  Company A pays millions in dollars and shares to Company B and then TAKES OVER
        COMPANY B.  Some "pie in the sky"!!!  So who puts out a CALL  for the removal of Company B management?
        You guessed it, Company A.  Company A under different BB name stirs up resentment.
        In addition ,Shareholders in Company A join in the CALL.  

Huttani you wrote: I must tell you that we followed up on your post and neither first Nations nor Husky heard anything like that.  Now the onus is on you to prove through the CEO via an NR before AGM.     

Who is WE.?...and whom did you ask?   Did you speak to the head of FNCC or Husky?  
Please tell us if you can...WE...Whom did you speak to????

I agree that REV must have a NR before the AGM.  And I have said that so many times before. 
Also, if this is so much fantasy and  "pie in the sky"  why would anybody want to TAKE OVER THIS COMPANY?
Maybe they want a  piece of the "pie in the sky"?

More later.....Respectfully yours........CurtiseverproddingREVforaPR.