RE: RE: Whatever Happens
For what it’s worth, this is from the third quarter report:
“On October 20, 2009 the Company restarted milling operations at Jerritt Canyon and is intending to restart mining in the near future.”
We may not receive any more information on production until the next report. Some companies are like that. If production at Jerriitt has been consistent since 10-20-09 then the fourth quarter report should be pretty good. Still no one else on the MB here seems to agree that trying to find out what production has been since 10-20 is a good idea. That seems nuts.
On another note, this board used to be pretty good, now it appears to be a little circle who respond mostly only to themselves. While many of the posts by members of this click present relevant information, one of them has recently overstayed his welcome with Nicole, and while this is sad news, it is also a reflection of a weakness. We heard again from another member this morning, with an “everything else” post, off the subject with material questionable in taste that I would prefer he keep to himself. Other posts contain suggestions to offensive language by using intentional misspellings that are not impressive. I appreciate posts that can make a strong point without suggestions to profanity.
The letter writing to the TNX is a good idea, and there are good questions being raised as to the legality of the process. I think there are already sufficient questions being raised, thanks to the work of many share holders, that things will not work out for the insiders as well as they would like.
Still the most outrageous reason for non-support has to do with continued fund raising. Enough with increasing the debt and dilution! Focus on production, get the bills paid and improve the value of the shares.
I believe the company can make ends meet with the income they have, but I could be wrong. This is where I’d like to see the focus of this board’s discussion, yet a certain group appears to see it as a non-issue. That too seems pretty nuts.
Anyone outside of this group have any thoughts or information on YNG’s ability to go forward with what they have over creating further paper?
Thanks for your recognition.
G.