Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by tmbfreeon Nov 23, 2009 12:25pm
382 Views
Post# 16514412

NAG - Raw Numbers

NAG - Raw NumbersI'm looking for peoples reactions to this (good, bad or indifferent).

Once NAG production is up and running at Mine #1, here is a simple calculation (by the raw numbers only) .. no commitments, no pay-outs etc.. just raw numbers. Any thoughts?

15,000 tons per month (Mine #1 - 12,800 BTU <1% S02)

x

$54.15 ( Central Appalachia 12,500 Btu, 1.2 SO2 )

=

$812,250.00 month

x 12 mos

=

$9,747,000.00 year
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>