Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kiska Metal Corporation KSKTF



GREY:KSKTF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by oddykogon Dec 02, 2009 11:27am
310 Views
Post# 16545239

RE: RE: Quarterly results

RE: RE: Quarterly resultsNo, I don't think the terms are different, but I don't know that there is a timetable for Kennecott to do anything beyond paying Kiska the $20 million.  A company that size could easily pay the $20 million and take their sweet time to move on to spending the money for the development.  They have control of the project with 51% and all we have is a minority stake reliant on Kennecott's plans and ours being the same.  Having said that I must admit that I have not seen the detailed contracts, so my interpretation may be a bit different from that in the fine print.

On the other hand if they pass on the project next year, we own the Whistler rights with only a royalty payable and WE get to decide with whom and when we move on with the project.

What I am saying is: $20 million in cash is nice, but a large viable mine is even better.
Bullboard Posts