Re The Question Was Richard, your post has not answered key questions nor" clarified " this illegal election. Why did the election not have the :FOR" or "AGAINST" as the only item voted on? Why is there a para 2 for the voters who voted "FOR" but no para 3 for those who voted "AGAINST"? That will become obvious as you read further. Read "at a meeting of shareholders of the company, I would vote in favour of the resolution". That is what the ballot says. The people who voted :FOR" are going to get to vote again at their tricky meeting and the "AGAINST" people will not be represented except by those individuals who can attend. This is nothing more than a shell game, Heads they win, Tails we lose. And why is the election still not closed? What gives them the right to extend the closing date? Ballot box stuffing is a good reason. Where the hell is the oversight of this corrupt election? There seems to be some real criminal activity going on here and we need a thorough investigation of the whole thing. You say in part C the "FOR" people "gave the company their proxys to vote at the General Meeting to be called at a later date". The ballot in front of me DOES NOT SAY THAT! Where is that written? And why would you accept this from Jeanny So who does not speak for YNG? These people must think we are all real morons to try a blatantly illegal trick like this. Have an election, and then call a meeting to override the election results because they don't like it, is beyond belief, but that is precisely what they are trying to do. Now the question is " Will the YNG stockholders stand for that"?. Maybe the TSX should explain to YNG what they meant by "an election of the stockholders"..Maybe add the words :FAIR" an HONEST" in front of the word election. To my fellow shareholders I can only say, BEWARE, we are dealing with some truly unscrupulous people. We need this looked at by the TSX, the OSC, the BCSC and even the RCMP. Just MHO. ICE