RE: RE: The Question Was...AlMer300 is correct. I experienced the same thing. Horns of a dilemma when voting against and then confirming two out of three points in the second question and being forced to confirm the third illogical follow through point. Badly written or contrived?. What happened to my vote? Did that inconsistency spoil the vote and not let it count count in which case it didn't matter at the electronic stage. But if the "fors" already have their votes in and counted for use in a physical real time shareholder meeting by tricky design without the negative voters having the same treatment I think that stacking is dirty pool and unfair to the disinterested shareholders in the most egregious way I have ever witnessed or heard of. There should be a requirement that the vote at a shareholders meeting be balanced and equal in all ways.