Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by estaticon Dec 05, 2009 7:42am
421 Views
Post# 16556965

RE: RE: RE: RE: Drilling near Goldsource

RE: RE: RE: RE: Drilling near GoldsourceAt this point it is nothing more than, 'potential'.

(i.e) ... "" Blue Star Energy LTD. (Blue Star) located in Hazard, Kentucky has agreed to purchase up to 15,000 clean tons of coal per month ... "".

Blue Star has agreed to purchase up to 15,000 tpm.
    - Can Nag deliver 15 tons?
    - Can Nag deliver 15 tons using 15 augers?
    - Can Nag deliver some 'solid' info?
    - Can Nag see a profit from their eventual and probable revenue?
    - Can Nag get their collective asses into high gear?

Yes, I am a holder; and if I read one more, "tree shaking or tax selling", comment, I'm going to snap.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>