Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

Red Mtn .. again ...

[dogone]

I really feel that after you see these reports that you will question the motives and operational procedures includingg fiduciary responsibility of the officers and directors ..

there is much more but you get the picture ...  here is more below ....

Discussion of Issues with Previous Exploration Efforts

 

The data we received to model proved to be mixed and scattered.  This was the result from chasing the “Mother Lode” with no methodology and too many lost samples.  For example, there were two holes drilled down the same shaft in two different years.  Hole DD 94-03 was over bored by RC 95-07 and extended the 94 hole by 6 meters with no significant results.  There are missing lab analysis prior to 2002 for example hole DD01-30 from 84 meters to end of the 240 m hole and DD 01-31 from surface to 156.8 m where the first significant gold results began in that hole.  There were also occasions in field logs were visible gold was noted and the sample disappeared.  The use of junior geologists was evident from their not completing all the standard method for mineral classification during the field logging.  This made geology modeling and correlating the geology nearly impossible. 

Too many shallow holes were drilled in the first 27 holes.  For example DD 01-28 showed that ore zones were at deeper depths in the saddle zone.  This hole and others completed in 2001 confirmed there are other zones separated by over 100 meters.