He's Back......After returning from Haiti where they will slit your throat for a dollar, it is frightening to come back to the REV BB.
Dogone, I do not believe that Stocktalk is asking you to BED over or BEND over. In my opinion, what Stocktalk may be saying is that the constant threats of litigation and disparaging remarks about the company may be hurting REV (and consequentially, your share price) by giving pause to potential purchasers. Whether you are correct or not in your assumptions dogone, , it has its effect. What you are doing now is called, SELF-ABUSE.
I return after all the yelling has subsided. Interesting that many of you have given personal information on your stock holdings to strangers. After all the threats and accusations and posturing, the board was re-elected by 98.5%. All the vacillation, "Yes, I'm for it, No now I'm against, No, I've changed my mind again", after all that NOTHING HAPPENED EXCEPT the SP fell. Nice move fellahs and gals.
Okay, let's get serious. REV must start drilling new wells by May, 2010. As far as the those Louisiana wells that are plugged, is it reasonable for REV to feel that this new product will UNPLUG them setting up a demand? That is a question but it makes sense IF REV is so confident in this product.
What we waiting for are the results of the testing at the FROG LAKE wells which may begin next month. If the results are positive we will be off and running.
So do what Stocky has suggested, WAIT FOR THE RESULTS, GET MORE KNOWLEDGE, and dogone, end your self-abuse.
I hope you are incorrect Stocky and that Wolfhead comes up with the money. In the meantime we have millions of shares of Eurogas and if he forfeits his end and we reacquire our European deal, I believe that we could possibly sell our newly regained interest in Poland in a heartbeat.
Now let us consider another subject. The slandering and lying going on. Any reasonable person here, should have no objections to honest criticism and personal opinion. But what we all object to are the lies and fabrications of some of you that are meant to deliberately hurt the reputation and qualifications of others. This has been occurring and much too frequently. Just because you THINK you are anonymous you can make up anything about someone and post it. Well, perhaps this latest article will change your mind:
https://www.stockwatch.com/newsit/newsit_newsit.aspx?bid=Z-C%3ALEO-1672937&symbol=LEO®ion=C
Lion Energy wins order against Stockhouse poster
Ticker Symbol: C:LEO
Lion Energy wins order against Stockhouse poster
Lion Energy Corp (C:LEO)
Shares Issued 85,192,737
Last Close 12/11/2009
.195
Monday December 14 2009 - Street Wire
by Mike Caswell
Lion Energy Corp. has secured a court order against Stockhouse Publishing Ltd., directing it to reveal the IP address of a bulletin board poster named CashEagle. Lion said that CashEagle authored a series of defamatory posts about the company, calling management a "group of clowns" who earn exaggerated salaries, among other things.
The order, obtained on Dec. 10, 2009, in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, directs Stockhouse to reveal the e-mail address, IP address or any other information that could identify CashEagle. The judge also instructed Lion Energy to pay any reasonable costs that Stockhouse incurs in retrieving and delivering the information.
Lion Energy's petition
Lion Energy secured the order one day after it filed a petition at the Vancouver courthouse against Stockhouse. The petition stated that Lion had asked Stockhouse to disclose any information to help identify CashEagle in November, 2009. Stockhouse's senior editor, Keri Korteling, replied that Stockhouse would not provide any such information without a court order.
The petition contains quotes from many of CashEagle's posts, which began on Oct. 22, 2008, and ended on Nov. 17, 2009. Lion Energy claims that they are defamatory of both the company and its chief executive officer, Brian Thurston. One, dated April 20, 2009, stated, "That does not encourage me to put my trust and money with these guys ... sometimes its better to have crooks in this rather than IDIOTS." Another the same day claimed that Mr. Thurston had acquired a property formerly owned by Bre-X Minerals Ltd., and stated, "This further speaks to the true genius of Thurston who has taken a small time Potash player into the big leagues by securing the rights to this 'elephant' gold deposit."
Further messages were directed at Mr. Thurston. One, dated May 8, 2009, said Mr. Thurston was simply concerned with collecting a pay cheque. It continued, stating, "Trusting Thurston has resulted in this companies cash position to go from $28M last summer to $21M now with nothing to show for it ... except some big payments to managements and certain consultants." Another on May 15, 2009, said, "I wish these f00kers would do their jobs and something meaningful for the stock price."
According to the petition, the final post came on Nov. 17, 2009, when CashEagle wrote that Mr. Thurston "was approached by a pretty blonde in a tight skirt and tall boots" who "educated Mr. Thurston on the amazing profits to be made in the pharmaceutical industry," and as a result, Lion Energy "will be changing its name to DimeBag Pharmaceuticals."
The petition was filed on Lion Energy's behalf by Daniel Reid of Harper Grey LLP.
Prior suits against Stockhouse posters
Stockhouse posters have faced legal action over forum postings many times in the past. One such lawsuit, filed on Sept. 1, 2009, by Farallon Mining Ltd., was against an Australian man, David St. Eloi. Farallon claimed that Mr. St. Eloi authored posts that accused the company's president, Dick Whittington, of stealing a property and of manipulating the stock. Mr. St. Eloi has not responded to the suit.
Farallon filed a petition against another Stockhouse poster named Stonecut on Oct. 6, 2009. Farallon sought and received an order requiring Stockhouse to provide Stonecut's IP address. Farallon then sought, and received, an order directing Shaw Communications Inc. to identify the owner of that address. The company has not yet identified the poster in court filings.
While many Internet libel cases never advance beyond the initial lawsuit, some do go to trial. One well-known case is the suit that Barrick Gold Corp. launched against a North Vancouver man, Jorge Lopehandia, on Oct. 31, 2002. In posts on Yahoo Finance and elsewhere, Mr. Lopehandia claimed that the company did not own its Pascua Lama property in Chile, and that the company had manipulated the price of gold to its advantage. The Ontario Court of Appeal ultimately found that Mr. Lopehandia had libelled Barrick, and ordered him to pay $125,000 to the company. Mr. Lopehandia never defended the case, and it is not known if he paid the judgment.
? 2009 Canjex Publishing Ltd.