puzzle: the SI Board obviously doesnot represent the interests of any and all shareholders who bought the stock above 30 cents and ALSO sustained the money losing operation for deades.
Next, the Board approved diltive financing and re-issuing of stpck options. All these measures , in retrospect were designed to put millions of shares in the hands of management and Board insiders. FOR THE LATTER TO BENEFIT FROM THE TAKE OUT :GUARANTEED JOBS, SALARIES, BONUSES, LEGALLY DISGUISED BRIBES??????
BUT HOW COME THE MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS SUPPORT THE BOARD'S SELL OUT DECISION= WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN OBVIOUSLY BETRAYED. HOW COULS THE CONSULTANTS BE BUYING SHARES WHILE RECOMMENDING SELL OUT. WHY DIDNT THE BOARD SEE THIS AS CONFLICT OF INTEREST???