RE: DWI vs competionI received this information from DRAGONWAVE. Any comments?
Thank you for youinterest in DragonWave. I cannot point you to a specific article describing thedifferences between the DragonWave and Ceragon products; however, I have triedto list below some of the competitive weaknesses we see in the Ceragon offering,versus DragonWave:
NoXPIC
Capacity and spectralefficiency lags top competitor
Limited frequencysupport with IP-10
Parallel TDMarchitecture adds significant management and operational complexity and protocolconversion overhead
Smart pipe limited to asingle GbE interface
No all outdoorsolution
No SyncEsupport
Limited configurationsupport
No scalable lowercapacity solution (<50 Mbps)
These translate intosome of the reasons we win in a competitiveencounter:
Superior throughput –up to 4000 Mbps vs. 1000 Mbps
Reduced annual spectrumcosts – XPIC and Bandwidth Accelerator drive up to 2.5X improvement in spectralefficiency greatly reducing spectrum costs
Enhanced configurationsupport – radio HSB, Space/Frequency Diversity
Multiple configurationoptions to better meet carriers’ varying needs – DragonWave Horizon offers alloutdoors, split and all indoor solution; while Ceragon’s IP-10 is onlyavailable in a split-mount configuration, a major issue for manycustomers
Horizon offers advancedqueuing and QoS support
Horizon supportsadvanced synchronization including SyncE and 1588v2