Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by lucci2005on Feb 12, 2010 10:51am
1007 Views
Post# 16780029

Blue Gem coal

Blue Gem coalAccording to Charles, we are (or I should say "will be"), only one of 3 producers of Blue Gem coal.  And, Charles believes we will be the biggest producer of Blue Gem Coal.  Are we talking millions of tons???  That alone warrants a lot more than 0.12/share.  That's one of the reasons I don't despare.  Do a google search and read about blue gem coal and you will realize that NAG is on to something here.  No wonder they are aggresively mining Kentucky (well I dunno if "aggressively" is the right word).  But instead of doing work on their Saskatchewan land (which is years away from production), or revisiting their LL property (which I believe is on the back burner because gold and other metals keep increasing in price--so NAG's profits will increase if they mine it later).  So yeah, in theory, I like what NAG is doing and where they are heading.  It's now only a matter of if they are capable and willing to get there.  GLTA and have a great weekend. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>