Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Connacher Oil & Gas Ltd CLLZF

"Connacher Oil and Gas Ltd is an oil company engaged in the exploration and development, production and marketing of bitumen. Connacher holds two producing projects at Great Divide are known as Pod One and Algar."


GREY:CLLZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by cartach13on Feb 13, 2010 5:08am
672 Views
Post# 16782935

RE: Long Like the Wolf

RE: Long Like the Wolf Agree with all of your post and am more or less in the same position.  Regarding SAGD vs tar sands mining, every time I read something about the bogeyman of the tar or oil sands or even worse see pictures of the open pit mining, I can't help but think that the environmentalists have a real good selling point helping them to get across maximum negativity to the general public and government both in Canada and the US, our biggest customer. The next thought is why aren't SAGD developers and producers pointing out the the obvious differences and minimal environmental footprint of SAGD ?  I t would be so easy to do and would get that part of the general public now against the oil sands either totally onside, or at least educated about SAGD and be more amenable to the idea that oil sands development is not all bad. And as public opinion goes so goes the government, especially when the subject is energy and fuel costs and availability. I think part of the reason is similar to the excuse a Hyundai company official gave today on TV when asked by a reporter about Toyota. He refused right off the bat, saying it was against company policy too comment about a competitor. That is why I think SAGD companies like CLL won't highlight the obvious enviromental benefits of their process,they're all in the same club.  If they did take that step however and promote the environmental benefits of SAGD they would give the enviromental groups an out and another option. Those groups know that they will never stop tar or oil sands mining in it's entirety but they will keep fighting and trying to impede development. But as I've observed in a number of other situations involving conventional mining companies, they will,if their backs are against the wall and in an attempt to at least gain a partial win,  accept the least enviromentally damaging alternative. SAGD gives them an excellent option in that regard and they may be receptive to promoting it in place of the worser 'evil' of open pit mining if push comes to shove. Who knows,but in any case I do think it's absolutely incumbent upon companies like CLL to point out the differences in the processes and the minimal environmental impact as part of their duties of maximizing shareholder value. To do this they have to get the message out and we all know they aren't.   JMO
Bullboard Posts