Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Post by stavros67on Mar 11, 2010 7:48pm
515 Views
Post# 16873696

Concerns?

Concerns?Firstly, I will say that I have been frustrated with management here, at times. But, I do think that they are learning from past mistakes and that is certainly a positive going forward.

I own a not insignificant amount of shares and have done so for awhile, now. I am always looking to accumulate on weakness as the story here is very compelling. The team they brought on board is a sign that they are looking to be a player in the coal business, a REVENUE producing player. As the price of oil goes up, high grade domestic coal becomes ever more valuable. In fact, I think Taylor was being WAY too conservative in his newsletter writeup, as I think they will ultimately be working with margins at LEAST double what he outlined.

Lastly, I read on JIm Sinclair's site that the Chinese have been busily, quietly buying gold with both fists, even going so far as to snap up the IMF gold sales. I think that Sinclair's 1650$ target will be histor by this summer and we will be loooking at 2000$ per ounce by year's end. Ponder the implications of that for Louise Lake, if you will.

cheers
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>