RE: RE: RE: RE: So...factsfinderyou presented information that you hadn't read. Why is that?
If, however, in the next three months the permitting issue was to beresolved and the capital projects at MWS were to resume
we beat the time line handily, so when I received that email from Bob Tait it was current information.
Please accept on face value that he was telling the truth.
I'll accept that the new managers won't be as avaricious about cash and will run FIU responsibly within their means. Should some additional funding be required it's there for the taking. I don't possess insider information and am not certain the cash on hand plus 50 million won't be enough but they can easily pace expenses as all the ducks are in a row. It was very clear in that MD & A we had a year of solution ponds storage running with 2 gold plants running and 2 years with one.
It also has been commented that the permit was withdrawn as FIU was building the new ones. Suffice to say it is back on track to completing what was started.
i think the firing/resignation/exorcizing of Miller and Brunette has changed the future of FIU significantly. The stench persists and as the odour lifts so will the shareholders fortunes.
All hail Vulisango.
I think the key question is whether Simmer and Jack will want or act too repair/absorb ownership of FIU as they had spun it off from their core holdings in the beginning. Others have wondered that as well. What could that mean?
The notes are available to 1/S & J, to 2/GW and to 3/RBC.
We won't know until they are requested. As for GW, I would as manager (huge assumption) drop them at the first opportunity and let it be known they are scum of the earth.