Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Fortress Global Enterprises Inc - Class A FTPLF

Fortress Global Enterprises Inc produces paper pulp, security papers, and other security-related products. The company through its segments produces dissolving pulp which is primarily used for viscose/rayon manufacturers in Asia. Its business is spread across Asia where it generates most of its revenues, Europe, Canada, and International.


GREY:FTPLF - Post by User

Comment by lanaar2on Mar 20, 2010 5:12pm
144 Views
Post# 16906734

RE: CEO Buys the Crown Jewels

RE: CEO Buys the Crown JewelsYea I agree with your first 3 paragraphs.


I finally saw FTP in the newspaper this morning (Montreal Gazette). Perhaps the stock will get more exposure since it will start doing biz in Canada.

Paying 3 million for the mill is peanuts considering the profit it can generate from current ops.

But I'd like to know more about the dissolving pulp industry. Can China ramp up production and capacity in a short amount of time ? That's my biggest worry. Up to now we were not competing with China.

There isn't much info out there, same goes for FTP's other 2 segments. I guess we will have to trust management like always.

The fair value option for the property,plant and equipement to me is a bad idea. First of all we should assume that investors already know what the replacement cost is. Making it clearer by opting for the fair value option to me would not present any new information. I don't think the term ''book value'' would be relevant anymore. It should be called ''fair value'' because nothing would be reported at cost anymore except for inventories. Plus, there are extra fees involved in keeping the assets at fair value. Plus, there would be more volatility in the shareholder's equity.
Bullboard Posts