Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

WISR Ltd V.WZR


Primary Symbol: WSRLF

Wisr Limited is an Australia-based neo-lender company. The Company provides a collection of financial products and services. The Company is engaged in writing personal loans and secured vehicle loans for three, five and seven-year maturities to Australian consumers, and funding these loans through the warehouse funding structures. It provides a Financial Wellness Platform underpinned by consumer finance products, the Wisr App. The Wisr App helps Australians pay down debt, multiple credit score comparison services and Australia’s first money-coaching app Wisr Today. Combined with content and other products that use technology to provide better outcomes for borrowers, investors, and everyday Australians. The Company’s products include loans, credit scores and round up. Its credit score is a summary of financial habits, and helps lenders get to know its customers. Its loan products include debt consolidation loans, car loans, medical loans and others.


OTCPK:WSRLF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by godfroggeron Apr 26, 2010 6:22am
489 Views
Post# 17029889

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: WZR

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: WZR
Sugar coated comments? My comments are accurate and relevant. How they taste to you is your own problem.

The wellbore behind intermediate casing did not cause the well control issues. The high pressure interval (Gulneri) which caused the problems is well below the intermediate casing shoe and in open hole. 
April 13, 2010
"The Company now plans to drill through the Aaliji interval to approximately 3,300 metres, and to log the hole and run 7 inch casing at that point prior to drilling into the Shiranish reservoir. The expected total depth of the sidetrack hole is approximately 3,900 metres, which is above the high pressure Gulneri zone. Upon reaching total depth, WesternZagros intends to log the hole and run a 4 1/2 inch liner"


Yes, I do suggest that the rig is inadequate and management made a mistake. Recall management themselves wrote in the annual info:
March 25, 2010
"contracting an alternative rig to allow for greater flexibility in drilling to the reservoir targets for the

third exploration commitment well"

(Note the word "alternative" there, Muley, as opposed to the word "additional"?  That is a key point, because an "additional" rig would cost "additional" money.  Looks to me like they will want to use the rig they have to drill a flank well, but find a different one for the third exploration well.  Could just move the rig over on the same lease and drill a deviated well to test the flank for an oil leg, saving some time and money, while negotiating for a bigger rig with higher BOP rating?)

While I was digging around in that news release for Muley I figured I'd pull out this bit to explain my response to Kaos (I inserted the word Kerogen in brackets to help explain the word 'source' in this context in case anybody did want to google it):

(Note the word "alternative" there, Muley, as opposed to the word "additional"?  That is a key point, because an "additional" rig would cost "additional" money.  Looks to me like they will want to use the rig they have to drill a flank well, but find a different one for the third exploration well.  Could just move the rig over on the same lease and drill a deviated well to test the flank for an oil leg, saving some time and money, while negotiating for a bigger rig with higher BOP rating?)While I was digging around in that news release for Muley I figured I'd pull out this bit to explain my response to Kaos (I inserted the word Kerogen in brackets to help explain the word 'source' in this context in case anybody did want to google it):

"Corporation has received an independent geochemical evaluation of the condensate tested from this

Oligocene reservoir which indicates that the condensate is from an oil-prone (Kerogen) source"


Bullboard Posts