Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Comment by WASKERWISKon Apr 30, 2010 2:18pm
562 Views
Post# 17049794

RE: priority review

RE: priority review

Player, TeeVee is a disingenuous, intellectually dishonest flake.  It is also very weird that he continues to post here.  Creepy weird.

Anyway, FDA obviously doesn’t give priority review to drugs where its probable that the priority will be a waste of time. 

Obviously also, if the median approval time for priority review is 6 months (it varies but it is around there) and if FDA's stated goal for approval is 6 months, it is a statistically unavoidable conclusion that not a whole lot of priority review filings are being delayed.  Not to say it can’t happen of course; just that it is quite improbable

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>