GREY:SLKEF - Post by User
Comment by
whaleron May 04, 2010 4:10pm
148 Views
Post# 17062135
RE: RE: RE: RE: MIA
RE: RE: RE: RE: MIASurething I can't be bothered explaining every little word I post especially if it is only my opinion to a person like you. You seem to have more fun dissecting and analyzing anything said bit by bit anyhow and when that's done you archive it away for retrieval and regurgitation later in a manner that seems to twist the original intent anyhow. A great example of that is how you treateds the poster Carol when she attempted to share her thoughts here on the SH board.
As for your list.....Your list is exactly what I said it was, nothing new. I recall your mention that I made the same statement , that I had nothing new to add. It seems your list fits the same status.
As for this quote " "Personally I would like them to be perfornance based or goal related."
it's fairly straight forward isn't it? Seems to fit well with the mood as of late when looking at 800,000 in the money options being exercised at .20
Have a question for you guys. If this company is so "done" and never had any potential, why not let it fall on it's ear and instead save all your time and energy for other more constructive projects.
My interest here is that I am a shareholder and liked the idea we might have a Nickel resource that was attractive to someone. I try to justify my own investment here by analyzing as much as I can from what is available public information. Sometimes that means waiting 3 months at a time too weed through MD&A or Management discussion filings. The company has their beliefs as well. Whether it is those quotes in promotional literature, magazine articles, webpage layouts, or intros explaining each NCIB we have seen. I have to believe that management is on the same page as shareholders and want to see this investment appreciate.
Call me a bagholder or whatever you like, but I am hoping there is a light at the end of the tunnel here imho.