Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

RE: RE: Micon

[whaler]

Once again Victor you take a persons words and try and turn them into something else. I have posted the PR and I have taken the libery to underline what I like about it and what it has told me. You seem to base your post on what it has not said and what it has not written. How about we stick to what we do know and that's the written PR.

I will restate

"Here's what I do know wrt Langmuir"

It is a simple statement and that is exactly what I want to say about langmuir's Micon report and my knowledge/understanding of it
Maybe you should re-read my post to Nickel77 today where I acknowledge much of the what Nickel has said today WRT the Micon report. I have agreed with him in stating that there is info that is lacking and it seemed incmplete to me as well.

"I think the reason you won't discuss this omission is that you know its a very damning piece of information. You and other pumpers have covered up previous suspicious lack of information with the innuendo that ISM would not want to make their prospects too attractive and tempt a hostile take-over."

I wonder how a piece of news can be "damning" when there is no mention of it either way?  I know nothing about it and I think it is you that assumes the worst if it is "omitted"  Seems that there is room for a lot of conjecture and speculation when there is no fact based material to refer to. "Hideous by it's absence" may work for you and I guess I am dumb enough to simply give them the benefit of the doubt. 
I would hope that RM and his new geologist at Langmuir know what they are working with in the Nickel belt.

As for what is or isn't "economical"...... how do we explain the block models for the L1 and LN site that Micon built based on the study they did. Referring to Table 17.2 as one example which can be found in the photo library over at the other site.  "Summary of input parameters used in estimation of a cut off grade and open pit optimization, Langmuir North Zone"
It was done using Nickel at $8, it showed a concentrate recovery of nickel at 77% with a fairly decent strip ratio. Am I missing something here? You state they don't know anything of the economics here?
I guess we differ in opinion and outlook for ISM most often I see a glass which is half full.  You have your opinions.

I choose to take the highroad when it comes to your long winded psycho analysis type posts you like to do on people who happen to be pro ism or shareholders hwo may have a positive outlook on their investment. Some things merit response and possible discussion and some do not thats our choice whether we choose to engage or not.
I guess with a lack of news things turn to the old personal attack posts and cage rattling. I don't care for it and it is not particularily constructive on a stock forum.  Have fun with that and hopefully you find it rewarding and personally satisfying. BTW The game of "last tag" is of  no interest to me either...... call it ignoring or running away from "debate" I call it for what it is.

IMHO