RE: RE: RE: < 1% gradeI think it's too early at this time to say that previous nr's were deceiving.
The cre obviously covered an area that was known to contain lower grade rees. Had we gotten these results from an area the USBM had previously determined to contain high levels of ree, THAT would not be good.
As it is, we exceeded USBM estimates in a low grade ree area. My thought is, if we're going to be doing a cre at all, we better be doing it in an area where we can expect impressive results...why bother trying to vaguely confirm previous mediocre results??
I still believe Ucore holds excellent potential. The reason for the cre will either become apparent in due course, or the cre will be forgotten about as drill results from the 2010 program come out and we move towards 43-101 compliance.
Seven.