RE: Where have all the cheerleaders gone?Hello Degans et al,
Yes; one had appreciated your recent provisioning of information, Degans.
Well stated, Degans.
You are correct; the “market’s makers” and stock price “shakers” do not (IMO) tend to buy the prevailing story outright; i.e. such savvy institutional investment account managers and retail kinds of “investors” do tend to concentrate on the financials and the correlations occurring amongst the information provided in conjunction with the numbers clearly emphasized by way of the financial reports.
The various “technical indicators” or charts, on the other hand, tend to support and provide for an “interpretation” of a particular rhythm, if you will.
It’s a rhythm which would-be in part influenced by said numbers and, amongst other quite specific requirements, the prevailing and incrementally unfolding story of the day, week, month, year, etc.
It would appear to some as though Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc representatives/”stakeholders” had somehow contributed to a priming of the pump; all this while the attached conduit or hose in question had been allowed to remain somewhat deficient – like holes in the hose, any “holes in the story” are invariably identified by those who would perhaps be more observant inspectors of any given pieces of information, Degans.
Nevertheless, let’s be clear.
Irrespective of the sentiment which you may or may not take away with you today, one does have some expectation (well founded or otherwise) that certain Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc and Aperto representatives/ “stakeholders” could be well equipped and perhaps well supported in their respective and/or collective endeavors.
One has noted that there are a couple of vested parties involved with Aperto and now Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc who could be considered as persons affiliated with certain investment industry “sharks” and the like; i.e. savvy persons who can quickly identify the value of or potential of any given meal, if you will.
One agrees Degans; i.e. we should now focus on a well established range which is supporting the TZT share price.
You all note that one had previously and quite presciently determined precisely what such a range would be; and this acknowledgement is not intended to convey that possibility that one could be patting oneself on the shoulder; not at all.
Briefly, one had noticed a potential for something occurring following the last most recent financing; and made a decision to follow and potentially act in unison with such a trend.
One had also noticed that the prevailing trend was premature and therefore weak; and that such a trend would turn.
Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc may have been electing to essentially capitalize on the opportunity to “leverage” certain created and resulting share valuations in order to broaden this parent company’s breadth, depth and potential reach.
Such a strategic maneuver is not at all new; it’s been intentionally utilized by those representatives and/or “stakeholders” who were operating or vested of plenty of growing and would-be quite profitably combined enterprises.
Additionally, there are plenty of unfinished or pending business transactions which we know of for certain, Degans. You’ll note that one had mentioned such pending business transactions.
$400,000.00 Dollars of either cash or the equivalent amount in shares of the corporation must be issued within the expiry of 60 days from the date during which the Aperto deal was finally consummated.
This is a fact. It’s a fact which can be later modified somehow; yet nonetheless, it’s a fact.
Here’s another fact.
25% worth of this Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc enterprise can be issued to the Aperto “stakeholder” or “stakeholders” in question; i.e. should said investors be so inclined.
The very fact Tranzeo’s share price is presently hovering at or about the
.90 cents per share price point is (IMO) not a mere coincidence.
Furthermore, you may want to consider precisely how much cash or cash equivalents the combined companies could have at their collective disposal.
After all, $40 to $45 Million dollars worth of revenues derived from telecommunications equipment contracts would require that there be sufficient amount of operating capital with which to fund the development, manufacturing and final delivery of the telecommunications equipment products which have been ordered.
You and I would know that you don’t produce pivotal telecommunications equipment products without first securing the needed financial backing (monies) with which to facilitate or allow for the physical production and delivery of such goods.
Again, both you and I know this; and you can bet your “assets” that “the market’s” more savvy investors and/or institutional enterprise “analysts” would certainly know this as well.
Have yourselves a great long weekend and always seek to be well and prosper.
Sherbet2