RE: RE: RE: naysayers
"My explanation is that there is a major trader who is influencing the market by trading to suppress the price."
The $64000 question is WHY? Is it to accumulate shares at a snail's pace, given the low volume? Is it to keep the price down so that BT can't get a decent PP done to enhance the coffers of the company, thus, opening up a cheap takeover? At my age I have absolutely no illusions left as to the lengths MMs will go to screw the investor. Anything goes with those b******s.
My feelings about "the market" can be summed up by the comment Sean Connery gave about his dealings with the Hollywood elites," I've been screwed more times than a wh*re".