YWell, marshaldylan, you are right about what Guerin says, though its actually other Supreme Court of Canada cases that elaborate on the duty of consultation. Its actually the duty of honourable Crwon conduct that is the source of the duty to consult, not fiduciary duty. Of course, that is neither here nor there but what is significant is that about half of the cases on the duty of consultation have found, on the facts of those cases, that consultation was sufficient. Until we know the facts, its impossible to determine whether it is Thompson or the Stellat'en People that are being unrealistic. One thing for certain is that merely filing a claim is no guarantee that the claim will be upheld. The other thing that is certain is that the consent protocol is well known to mining companies who mine in areas where there are aboriginal claims. We will need to wait and see.