RE: RE: For Onadriis et alHello Ondariis et al,
You, Ondariis, stated, “your verbiage is tres nerdy. you state solid and valid points but without concluding them, so simply food for thought CHOMPCHOMP.
Response: After having read and understood ones response to the graphic illustration which BayStreetkid provided yesterday, one is quite certain that BayStreetkid clearly understood what could be “concluded.”
Do you require more KY Jelly BayStreetkid.
After all, it could appear as though you (BayStreetkid) are feeling some degree of discomfort today, eh. LOL
Hmm; perhaps we shouldn’t be discussing or mentioning the kind of “discomfort” which certain Tranzeo Wireless Technologies shareholders could-be meant to sense, i.e. following this presented opportunity to ca$h in shares which may have been accumulated by or perhaps on behalf of certain would-be covering analysts or “intermediaries”, eh.
Should this have been a brief priming of the pump (see
.75 to
.96) before the conference call and then a precipitous decline in share value, due to the perhaps would-be occurring dump which could result following this conference call …?
Well, suffice to state that you, Ondariis, are going to need a lot more assistance in keeping the market’s participants (both retail and institutional) from reaming you and perhaps this company’s prospects a new one, so to state.
Was that concluded well enough for you, “boy” or Ondariis.
It’s merely some food for your particular thought process, eh.
This is and I AM – CANADIAN,
The Sure Bet Too
....