RE: RE: Don't understandHello AmericanInv et al,
First and foremost, your question as to why one refers to oneself as “one” would be answered in many ways.
One potential answer, an answer which could be immediately determined by way of you asking yourself and immediately answering a certain in turn posed question) would be quite obvious.
On that note, let’s have you try to answer the immediately following and perhaps peculiarly humorous question, AmericanInv.
Why does a dog lick its private regions, lol?
Perhaps we’ve appropriately dealt with the question as to why one elects to call oneself “one”, AmericanInv?
Additionally, one will unambiguously state that something could-be sensed by some persons as perhaps beginning to smell rotten; and perhaps this something would not have anything to do with Denmark, AmericanInv.
Re: Target price
Again, one had suggested that “an $8.00 Dollar per share price target would-be kind of rich”; and provided that no immediate and overwhelmingly positive news would be forthcoming within the next 9 business days, one will elect to stand by the potential $1.80 to $2.00 per share price determination.
To reiterate, a $1.80 to $2.00 per share price during the interim would have to be dependent upon or associated with, amongst other previously mentioned potentials, Tranzeo Wireless Technologies/Aperto representatives having finally settled any and all “obligations” associated with the purchase of the Aperto enterprise from the Aperto “stakeholder” or “stakeholders” in question.
As previously emphasized, your projected $8.00 share price suggests that either the Tranzeo representatives or Aperto representatives would “secure a great portion of a $25,000,000.00 to $50,000,000.00 Million Dollar contract award within the next 3 to 6 months” or something similar.
By the way, you and/or others may want to note that one’s Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc investment is presently underwater markedly in excess of 20%; and that monies placed here with Tranzeo recently could have been utilized elsewhere; and more importantly, such monies could have otherwise generated (pay attention now) a “guaranteed” return on Investment which would be in excess of 20%.
Furthermore, you were wondering how one arrived at (or, as you suggested, drew) the prior conclusion, i.e. the conclusion as pertains to the Tranzeo Wireless technologies share price precipitously falling all the way down from in excess of $1.60 per share.
Sufficed to state that one arrived at such a sub
.90 cent conclusion in a manner which was quite similar to the way in which one determined that a guaranteed return on investment, i.e. an ROI which would be in excess of 20%, could be experienced within a very quick interval, e.g. approximately 7 to 10 business days.
Here’s a calculation and an accompanying question for you and “others” to quite seriously mentally masticate upon and answer, respectively, AmericanInv.
One is down in excess of 20% here at Tranzeo and one had intentionally passed up the opportunity to lock in a “guaranteed ROI” which would have been markedly in excess of 20% elsewhere.
Question: Given the immediately afore stated information, what would a minimal ROI (i.e. a “base case” and perhaps bloody well expected, return on investment with Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc) be entirely calculable as being produced within the next 9 business days?
Note: The answer to the posed question would certainly provide you and “others” with a near term valuation or an interim projected share price which you (being an American investor) could quite easily arrive at, eh.
In closing, Mr. Tocher clearly indicated that certain U.S.A based wireless Telecommunications service providers (perhaps certain Tier1 American incumbents, e.g. AT&T or smaller competitors) would no longer be willing to wait for the American Broadband network development assistance which would be provided by way of the mandated U.S Government nationwide Broadband spending initiative.
Note: Not being willing to wait should not immediately translate into Tranzeo/Aperto or any other equipment developer/manufacturer/supplier having to wait until the end of the year in order to somehow secure purchase orders from such would-be successful and apparently “impatient” American Nationwide Broadband Initiative funding applicants.
Provided such kinds of purchase orders had been somehow previosly secured by or on behalf of Aperto representatives/”stakeholders”, such impatient applicants and would-be acquirers of such telecommunications equipment components should be intending on opening the spigot immediately – we’ll note the “first to market” first to profit advantage and such.
One will always tell it like it is; or at the very least, tell it as one has identified such a scenario as being, eh.
This is and I AM – CANADIAN,
The Sure Bet Too
PS: Could we appreciate something similar to a short squeeze, AmericanInv.