RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: timeline"reuters said it failed because it failed...if it didn't they wouldn't be able to say it". You are kidding, right? The reuters "reporter" you're referring to is some kid in bangalore making .10 an hour covering tons of stories including the goings on a city hall in nyc. he'll fire the stories off to his editor in the US. the "reporter" probably did your taxes as well...firing them off to your well paid accountant. he spun what sct reported. "failure" is an easy word for him to choose. media is there for the controlling.....sct just didn't bother. As far as "getting away with it"...please. ever watch cnn and fox cover the same story? They get away with whatever spin they want. however...based on today's nr....i think sct is learning about control. A nice, albeit defenseive move. keep up the negative posts. gives me hope, as i get real nervous when everybody is reading off the same page