Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited V.MSQ



TSXV:MSQ - Post by User

Post by junior_mineron Jun 24, 2010 1:34am
257 Views
Post# 17216953

I repeat, NOT feasible

I repeat, NOT feasible
Fundamental research used Mo price. they got NPV of -441m for 10000 tpd case using 10\lb Mo price.
MSQ scoping study states 1100 m with 7.5 moly oxide price! I rest  my case. MSQ did not fool fundamental research and the report is mighty negative. The funniest thing is they paid for it.


By the way Biobot does not mention that produced (Mo) lbs did not match to moly oxide either. What a surprise. But in all they have some kind of error in total produced pounds.

FRC: "DCF Valuation - Our DCF model showed that the project is not feasible based on our longterm
Mo price assumption of US$10/lb. The following table shows a summary of our
valuation model."

Too bad MSQ investors don't know what DCF means...
Bullboard Posts