well put llukeThe $100K/month "cashflow" is merely a distraction since it contributes towards the purchase price. I suppose it DOES show us that Alca is motivated to and will likely close the deal, but at no penalty to them for their delay. There should definitely be something in place to protect us from delays AS WELL as factoring the increasing price of gold into the deal.
If the $100K/month were non-refundable and DID NOT contribute to the purchase price, then it would be in Alca's best interest to close the deal as soon as possible. This latest news release does quite the opposite.
ps. That $9M deal is now worth $10M as the price of gold is up 11% from when the original proposal was presented.
Petesky.