Kure Technologies Inc V.KUR.H

RE: RE: RE: RE: indamoney u have no clue

[InDaMoney]

Lets analyze your propoganda 6180..

Firstly...

The price you put on the tax losses like everything else you utter changes by the post.. You already lsot a $5000 bet with me where I dug up an old post or two of your when you challengedme to prove you once had a different set of numbers.

Secondly...

How can you testify as to what the industry has or hasn't done or offered regarding anything to do with look's assets?

Yes its reasonable to assume that a normal set of business men and women wouldn't touch McGoey and his crew with the Former head of Scotia Mcleod's infamous ten foot pole..  but would it stop them from buying soem tax losses? maybe.. if this "gang" were to try and tie some sleazy side deal into the mix it just might .. but we don't know that.. soemassume its why the spectrum went for peanuts..  but its all just speculation.. the point being we don't know if management is the problem.. or do we?

Could it be that Siber.. your hero.. has indeed caught wind that soemone is interested? Is he going to all this trouble to make sure it happens? To make sure those tax losses land in the right hands? Was old InDaMoney ;-) bang on again?

If that is the case then the other things I've suggested related to that prospective reality also become relevant Mr 6180.. 

As ...if the move is to make the tax loss deal work then the real reason for this  white knight routine is anything but righteousness.... and its then unreasonable for shareholders to assume ro expect action towards holding management accountable above and beyond typical industry standard theater.. afterall.. if management was so agreived by this whole thing and the ptoential they'd be hald to account they certainly didn't show it.. they never invested a dime to boost their vote.. and considering the whole company could be bought for ten million at $.10 per share they could have easily grabbed ten million shares for at most $1.5 to $2.0 mill to retain control... especially considering they'd get a chance to cash themselves out  and recoup that money... but why would a "gang" that just absoncded with over $20 mill collectively re-invest a meager $2 mill to retain control and avoid being held to account????

There I go thinking logically again..

So tell me 6180.. what deal was cut with management? Does it include allowing them to walk away? Will they return a small fraction of the ill gottens?

Why did they ask you bnot to post until after the vote? .. lol

Take Care!

InDaMoney