=======================
You stated, “No surprise that the "gang" is going after their ridiculous service agreements.. even though they must know a judge will explode when he/she sees the extent of abuse.”
Response: The last most recent Ontario Superior Court of Canada worship ruled with and in favor of the actions or inactions which Gerald T. McGoey et al had been intent to pursue and sustain, respectively.
To begin with, it was, as one understands it to be, an “abuse of process” and a waste of taxpayer monies to entertain the farce associated petitions and actions which the former corporate officers and directors approved of and elected to leverage.
Moreover, should the latest group of “missionaries on assignment” decide not to follow any pre-approved script, if you will; the next presiding worship would - more than likely - rule in favor of Messrs McGoey, Dolgonos and any others known to one as being coalescing segments of ...
What the Frack are you talking about? It makes no sense whatsoever.. do you not grasp the concept that if people haven't a clue what you're talking about its a waste of everyone's time?
Note: People charged with policing the various regulatory and legal authorities are not to interested, as one understands it to be the case, in LQQking out for sanctioned players who are stepping out of bounds; such authorities are LQQking for uninvited and not “sanctioned” persons who would be stepping inbounds, if you will.
Let me suggest to you that the main reason this "gang" has gotten away with so much for so long has more to do with the fact the directors of the companies they've been involved with are sorely lacking any integrity.. the system is set up so the directors absorb responsibility for wayward insiders they don't reign in. ... but that concept is a farce as we all know.
In order for the little guy to make that happen they need deep pockets.. which is something the little guy doesn't have.. if they did they wouldn't be the little guys now would they? And thatis the idea behind the website: www.avestedinterest.org .. to empoer the little guy by allowing him/jher to join forces and apply resources towards accountablility struggles etc
I will once again point out that the anonymous coward saherbet2, who has never offered shareholders anything of value to help them, has an issue with the website.
Its apparantly better to post anonymously and call others names than actually try and devise a way to actually accomplish something productive.
The Ontario Securities Commission is a joke.. they are the laughing stock of all regulators in North America.. I refer to them as completely incomeptent but clearly it goes beyond that.
The latest terminology I heard thrown around in regards to them ("Complicit") points towards corruption being the culprit if I'm understanding the jist of things correctly... I don't have any first hand knowledge of anything like that.. but there was no mistake in my understanding of what was stated... and it appears to go back a long ways
Sometimes i catch wind of things before they become a public scandal.. Is this one of those times? We'll see... it would sure explain an awful lot. .. like why they allowed this group to prey on the Canadian public for so many years all the while knowing the public was very much in danger.
The OSC needs to go.. that much I'm positive of .. not be rebranded.. it needs to be completly deleted.. only the lower level people should be re-assigned to the new national regulator..
All decision makers need to go in my opinion.. at the very least what ails the OSC is a top down illness.. much like the companies they should be holding accoutable the problem starts at the top.
I'd like to see look and UBS shareholders sue the OSC.. they allowed this all to happen.. they knew years ago shareholders were at risk.. both physically and financially.
As on suggested previously, “the fix” was, is and will remain as being in, if you will – and it certainly appears as though the “interested accountants/auditors and the various “interested lawyers” are not going anywhere, eh.
Yeah Sherbie.. afterall they've been in power all of 72 hours.. i mean they must have had one or two meetings already.. so drawing conclusions to justify berating their agenda is warranted.. good grief..
You also stated, “When Alex/UBS had a disagreement with PixStream he dispatched a "vanload of russians" to deal with it.”
Yes i did.
Response: and exactly how would you just so happen to know about such information, Mr. InDaMoney.
The Toronoto Star article that quoted the former CEO (i believe it was the CEO) of PixStream when he discussed how a "van load of russians" showed up to collect.
Didn't you know that?.. oh yeah.. you weren't here.. your persepctive isn't the same as some of us who were here.
Hmm; where you one of the persons who had allegedly been accompanying Mr. Dolgonos to that collectively operated Pixstream/Unique Broadband Systems Inc development and engineering lab facility; or like David Baines, do you merely appreciate providing attention to the perhaps most sensational aspects of an intentionally developed story, so as to keep the reader distracted from paying due attention to the very reason as to why this alleged “vanload of Russians had been alleged to have accompanied Mr. Dolgonos to said facility?
You know I wasn't part of a van load of Russians Sherbie.. yet you throw it out there anyways... why? Why is it you continually try and defame me and imply I'm part of this "gang"or some other nefarious entity?
Is it just a cowards habit? Being a full fledged coward who hides behind anonymity and slings rocks at people have you simply just become entranched at defaming anyone that brusies your impaired ego?
And why would readers here be interested in why a CEO dispatched a van load of Russians? Are you implying that there lies a good reason to behave like a common thug or gangster if one is a CEO and has a reason you feel warrants that sort of third world sewer-rat behavior?
You are presenting more and more like a “clownette”, InDaMoney.
Again.. the coward hiding behind the handle Sherbet2 is once again calling me names... anonymity is your badge of courage... not for long..
Ask the right questions; as opposed to distracting readers with what you would rather they focus on.
Ask whom the right questions? You? The clock has timed out on you Sherbie.. You have nothing of value to offer.. you're a fraud.. get over it.
Where exactly are all the co-developed technologies or technical aspects which PixStream representatives and Unique Broadband Systems Inc “employees” had been working on or had completed, while representing intentionally targeted Unique Broadband Systems Inc common “peasant class” shareholders?
Why are you asking me about this? I couldn't give rats backside .. the talk on the street over what happened between UBS and Pix Stream was always the same... it appears the industry felt UBS simply extorted pixStream.. you see PixStream needed UBS to drop any claim to what pixStream was selling in order to collect the $500+ Million deal they had entered into... if UBS really did own title to any of that tech why did they settle for $25 mill???
I'm with the street on this one .. just thugs behaving like thugs and getting rich doing it. The Pix StreamCEo made the right decision in paying UBS though.. it wasn;'t long after that the tech bubble collapsed and their tech was essentially worth much much less.. extortion pays.. whoda thunk it..? Bell?
Moreover, what precise amounts of monies had been derived by way of earlier and/or later allowing for the implementation of or the employment of such advanced technological aspects or developed Intellectual Properties by parties other than those parties directly employed by and on behalf of Unique Broadband Systems Inc common “peasant class” shareholders?
More nonsense from you.. you write these long drawn out sentences and paragraphs and never say anything.. you just throw stuff out there.. and it never leads anywhere.. you are a complete waste of time in my opinion.
Your “bum buddy”, a.k.a. David Baines, did not appear to one as being too interested in delving into such questions or that which such kinds of questions would most certainly lead to, InDaMoney.
There you go again... you fixation on a certain orifice and continuous remarks regarding homosexuality is relentless and quite telling.. it goes beyond immaturity in my opinion.
This may be hard for you to understand Mr Sherbie.. most of us couldn't care less if you or anyone else is gay.. its a non issue.. "live and let live" is how most of the people I know approach life.. i suggest you come into the 21st century sooner than later.
Carpe Diem Mr Sherbet2.. Carpe Diem...
Alas, it’s quite obvious that you may have been more interested in “leveraging” information which one coud expect that you had in some specific way been allowed (perhaps by or in some part due to some of your professional associations or associates) to uncover and discover?
Support the rubblish you write!..
What information are you referring to and how did I exploit or "leverage" it for any gain.. personal or other. You just talk out your backside relentlessly.
Keep in mind that Nicolas Sarkozy, The President of France, recently raised his hands up and showed reporters his hands (palms facing forward); Mr. Sarkozy did this so as to suggest that he has clean hands - see the political smear campaign which is afoot.
As pertains to the extent of your past/present involvement with this farcical endeavor, can you do the same – please note that one is presently doing so, InDaMoney.
You are an anonymous internet poster!..
How can you claim anything as it pertains to credibility in your personal life? if you want to be treated seriously or with some form of respect you feel you have earned and are not receiving i suggest you man up and come out from behind the cloak you so cowardly hide behind.
You have the nerve to attack others continuously from behind your little cloak.. then announce your hands are clean.. good grief.. Your whole world revolves around an internet personality you think is reveered or respected in some fashion.. sober up!
As one had suggested previously, there is absolutely no need for a board of directors being appointed. And we certainly do not need a newly designated CEO, a person who just so happens to utilize the surname McCutcheon - out with a McGoey; and in comes a McCutcheon named “missionary on assignment”,eh.
There is a need for a board and CEO if chasing former management is the goal.. a trustee won't persue costly remedies unless a judge orders it. It will all just get swept under the rug.
Finally, you stated, “The only thing these guys will understand is the sound of a gavel right before a judge brings them down to earth... Just like Conrad Black.. his arrogance had more to do with his sentence than his alleged crimes... he's in jail for contempt of the authority of law itself.. he can't be reformed.. he will always be in contempt of everyone and everything as he feels he's above it all.. he even let his Canadian citizenship go.. and belittled the country, Canada, he was born in, educated in, and found business success (thanks to daddy's help) in.
Response: The self-exposed “missionaries on assignment”, persons who had been/are leveraging their respective positions as operators of Canadian and American media enterprises, are far too content to continually bash Mr. Conrad Black.
Nevertheless, do keep in mind that these are the very same type of questionable persons (in ones opinion, intentionally leveraged “intellectual prostitutes” at best and “Americanized” Anglo-Saxon Capitalists at worst) who would choose to turn their respective backs toward and requisite attention away from the very shenanigans which Mr. Jim Balsillie and his fellow cohorts over at Research In Motion had elected to pursue.
Yeah yeah yeah... same rant over and over.. has nothing to do with UBS or Look.. and doesn't make any sense .. yet you repeat it over and over .. were you picked on by some Englishmen at some point in your travels Mr Sherbie? You're ItaIian right? is there some kind of bad blood i'm unaware of between "Anglo Saxons" and your peeps? Don't tell me.. A World of Warcraft right related spat right?
Here's the deal
Mr. Conrad Black knows “the Truths”; i.e. all of the “Truths” which pertain to and directly or indirectly contribute to his finding himself influenced by this present circumstance.
What deal?
Conrad is a convicted crook.. he's also a bully and he deserves everything that has ocurred and then some.. he used to keep his board inline by threatening to sue them into oblivion at every turn.. his arrogance was unbelievable.. many of his shareholders were powerful people in the US.. it was only a matter of time .. not too bright afterall huh?
He was caught on film destroying documents mr Sherbet2..even though the judge ordered him not to.. are you defending his criminal behavior? Its as serious as a crime gets.. removing the alleged evidence of a crime after the fact.. think about it.. its a sure sign he's in the right place.
He, much like mcGoey and Alex scre$ed shareholders at every turn.. he, much like mcGoey and Dolgonos got away with it for years and years.. then one day BAM!!
Although his writing is often a treat (not always) his dismissal of Canada on the world stage did him in with many Canadians.. we see him as ungrateful .. he will always believe that his country had little to do with his successes in life.. just like Gerry will always believe he deserves tens of millions for being the biggest failure he could possibly be in his role as CEO.. at least Alex landed a nice contract.. Gerry lined his pockets... like a common -----.
It speaks volumes about Bell too by the way.. Gerry held some high positions at Bell.. Bell has been essentially protected for comeptition in this countyr.. there has been no real competion in their core business.. how will a company that hires the quality of execustives like Gerry T McGoey compete now that government protection is ending?? I wouldn't trust mcGoey to run a hot dog stand.. and I expect Rogers to crush bell going forward as their little nudge nudge wink wink price fixing agreements etc get thrown out the window... the reason ... Roger's hires far superior executives.
By the way, David Baines would not be, in ones opinion, worthy of shining Conrad Black’s shoes; nor would Jim Balsillie and/or the other “sanctioned” “options backdating” appreciating degenerates.
Why must you always attack others when you don't feel appreciated? Its a sign of mental/emotional problems Mr Sherbet2.
And why do you think I'm interested in your opinion of David Baines anyways? Do you think that by insulting him I'll get upset or something? is that how the logic in your little cowardly mind works?
By the way.. Was your opinion of him better before you sent him what you considered to be information of value and he replied that he couldn't uderstand what you wrote?
Why is it you can't seem to grasp that much of what you write makes no sense nevermind is of any value to shareholders?
Dozens of people here have told you over the years that your writings often make no sense.. yet you behave as though we're all out to lunch.. thats tin-foil hat behavior Mr Sherbet2.
What exchanges I've had with Mr Baines haven't been difficult.. he's intelligent and has always shot straight with me to my knowledge.. if you are having trouble getting him to read your tripe perhaps write some non tripe and try again.. try contacting the home world and asking for them to beam down some assistance.
Alas. Jim Balsillie et al should enjoy it while they are allowed to remain on top, if you will; they would also do well to specifically note the precise reasons as to why Mr. Conrad Black had been “allowed” to be targeted and had been selected to fall.
Again... Conrad's downfall was his own doing.. did you research what he was accused of?
He was "dipping" Mr Sherbet2.. getting paid for things he shouldn't have been getting paid for.. taking non compete fees etc.. it was beyond abusive.. in fact in at least one case I suspect fraud charges were well in order. .. he got lucky and he'd have gotten a slap on the wrists if it weren't for his own arrogance and defiance.
He'd also still be a Canadian citizen if he wasn't wired to be such a tyrant in the first place i suspect. He's the creater of all his problems.. and he's playing a victim like they always do.. as will Gerry and especially poor old Alex.. he's already played the poor Russian Jew card for a news paper story.
I have family from Russia that are also Jewish.. and they inform me there was no prejudice against a family of engineers in the old Soviet union.. I'm told they'd have lived like kings in comparison to others.. there was a rolling of the eyes in regards to the strife he must have endured.. this from a family that had to travel to several countries including Israel to get to Canada..they came here with nothing.. the clothes on their back. So my sympathies towards the predators with a sad stroy don't run very deep.
And as a footnote to that.. none of them would ever dream of taking from others.. they love and respect this country and its people and are greatful for everything they have...
Are you suggesting basille is comitting the same "crimes" as Conrad mr Sherbet2?
Shareholders often turn a blind eye when everyone is making money.. but when the good times end the claws come out.. that is a universal truth..
In closing, one does duly note that you had stated, “so treat these guys like the danger to Canadian society they are.. the Ontario Securities Commission is incapable and unwilling to do so.. but the RCMP without the OSC are very capable.. they deal with these types all the time. Invite them in.
Response: To reiterate, the people charged with policing the various regulatory and legal authorities are not, as one understands it to be the case, LQQking for “sanctioned” persons who are stepping out of bounds.
Indeed, such authorities are, in ones opinion, LQQking for uninvited and not “sanctioned” persons, persons who would be seeking to step inbounds and into the playgrounds which a certain kind of degenerates had been assigned to playing within, if you will.
And I'll reiterate..
The reason the hammer never drops on this "gang" has more to do with the directors and their lack of any integrity than the OSC.
Yes the OSC is incomeptent.. and perhaps even worse.. (we'll see).. but the directors are the ones responsible for policing the behaviors of insiders and in the cases of Look and UBS the directors aided and abetted and in one case even dug in themselves.. they deserve the lions share of "wrath" in my opinion..
if I were deciding punishments I'd give the directors ten years for allowing all this nonsense.. they "allowed" it.. it wouldn't have happened without their help.. they are the equivalent of the protectors yet enabled the predation.
The industry is now stained to the point all directors are wearing the stench of this "gang".. so expect the industry to react eventually Sherbie.. this "gang" peed in the pool as the say in such vast amounts its not being dlluted... the stain will be worn by all.
I'd like to see a breach of honest services law that also targets wayward directors.. in other words if a director takes on the responsibilit of policing insiders then helps them abscond they should face ten years themselves... its radical i now but if you want the predators to stop preying such a law will at the very least cut it down to just the very stupid or very criminal..
This is andI AM – CANADIAN,
I'm beginning to doubt that..
The Sure Bet Too