Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Baru Gold Corp V.BARU

Alternate Symbol(s):  BARUF

Baru Gold Corp. is a Canada-based junior gold developer with NI 43-101 gold resources in Indonesia. The Company is focused on developing and producing precious metals projects in Indonesia. The Company’s focus is on developing precious metals projects with significant resource upside potential and near-term production capabilities. The Company’s Sangihe Gold project mineral tenement consists of one block covering the southern half of Sangihe Island, located between the northern tip of Sulawesi Island (Indonesia) and the southern tip of Mindanao (Philippines). The Sangihe Project covers 42,000ha; this includes the Bawone, Binebase prospects on the eastern part of the island and Taware prospect in the south-central region with infrastructure in place. The Company has a 70% interest in the Sangihe project.


TSXV:BARU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by sal_bandoon Jul 16, 2010 4:03pm
419 Views
Post# 17275897

RE: RE: IUP

RE: RE: IUPZubr this is the way I look at it. EAS has a mining license (IUP). After obtaining this license one of two things happened:

1. The government decided that Miwah was to be designated a SRA.
2. EAS knew that Miwah was designated an SRA and applied for the wrong license.


It is highly unlikely that Mike Hawkins is a moron and so I wouldn't assign too much weight to option #2. So, most likely we are looking at option one and EAS has three choices:

1. Seek arbitration (I think that they will win this one because no one supports retroactive laws)
2. Get a clarification on  the status of Miwah. If turns out that Miwah is non-SRA then mining and permitting can proceed.
3. Work with the stakeholders to get a IUPK if required.

I believe that the company is pursuing options 2 and 3. I feel confident that they can work it out. The risk is small.

Bullboard Posts