Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Tidal Acquisition Corp T.AAA


Primary Symbol: V.AAA.P

First Tidal Acquisition Corp. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The Company's principal business is the identification and evaluation of a qualifying transaction and once identified or evaluated, to negotiate an acquisition or participation in a business subject to receipt of shareholder approval, if required, and acceptance by regulatory authorities. The Company has not generated revenues from operations.


TSXV:AAA.P - Post by User

Comment by str8tgoodson Jul 21, 2010 10:48am
301 Views
Post# 17284642

RE: Being i'am SURE this., STR8TGOODS

RE: Being i'am SURE this., STR8TGOODSPont taken woundedknee, and after reading my post I realize that I could have phrased it differently.

I wrote, "What I'm getting at is, if there was a discrepancy in the first sampling results in Hole #1, then without releasing the low values they should have just not released any numbers until the sample was reassessed. "

What I meant to say was that if there was a discrepancy in regards to the results of any zone in Hole #1, or if not all zones had been fully analyzed, then without releasing the low values they should have just not released any numbers until all the samples from all the zones were assessed from Hole #1. 

woundedknee, with public companies there is a need to market the company wisely.  Why would a negative release be made, when not all prospective zones had been analyzed?  Doesn't make much sense to me.  I think that was a mistake and contributed to the share price floundering. 

These mistakes, along with other miscommunication between the company and shareholders just should not happen, IMO.
Bullboard Posts