TSXV:AAA.P - Post by User
Comment by
str8tgoodson Jul 21, 2010 10:48am
301 Views
Post# 17284642
RE: Being i'am SURE this., STR8TGOODS
RE: Being i'am SURE this., STR8TGOODSPont taken woundedknee, and after reading my post I realize that I could have phrased it differently.
I wrote, "What I'm getting at is, if there was a discrepancy in the first sampling results in Hole #1, then without releasing the low values they should have just not released any numbers until the sample was reassessed. "
What I meant to say was that if there was a discrepancy in regards to the results of any zone in Hole #1, or if not all zones had been fully analyzed, then without releasing the low values they should have just not released any numbers until all the samples from all the zones were assessed from Hole #1.
woundedknee, with public companies there is a need to market the company wisely. Why would a negative release be made, when not all prospective zones had been analyzed? Doesn't make much sense to me. I think that was a mistake and contributed to the share price floundering.
These mistakes, along with other miscommunication between the company and shareholders just should not happen, IMO.