RE: NAG should...A couple of things...
1) just for the record, NAG has received at least 1 concrete offer for LL (I won't confirm who it was from and also, don't ask me how I know, I will not confirm my source(s)
2) in the link that "wallywilly" posted for mine #3 application, can anyone find out where it says that "240,000 tons will be mined"? It says this in 2 different places. If that's the case, wouldn't this put the mine only at 10 months life and not 15-20 years?
And no, I'm not bashing. I've been with NAG for 3 years now and all the people on this board know me not to bash (or pump). But the 240,000 tons caught me by surprise. Please let me know your thoughts. Anyone????