RE: RE: RE: please, please go downYes, I'm quite aware of it. I'm also aware that they did considerable analysis of Slam's properties/deposits in their 28 page report, as well as comparisons with other similar companies to derive their 0.33 target. So, I'd disagree with you that it is meaningless.
As others have said here, simply comparing our properties, deposits and results from them with other companies that have produced similar results (and in many cases not as good), Slam is currently considerably undervalued, and would have to increase 3-4 fold to have a similar market cap as these high profile cos. that we often receive notice about in our inboxes.
0.33, maybe a meaningless target, I guess. How about 0.43? More meaning?