Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Comment by TheRock07on Sep 14, 2010 6:53am
264 Views
Post# 17444511

RE: A Heart of Gold

RE: A Heart of GoldVery good read.

The drilling program is not only aggressive but well spaced ,as is evident from the drill locations.

As a rule of thumb, Inferred resources in situ are worth about $100 per oz.

In the higher  43-101  categories ( Measured and Indicated ) , the going rate is about  double that or about  $200 per oz.

The main difference between Inferred and the higher categories is the level of statistical confidence (  measurement error ) in resource estimates , as modelled by the geostat model.

In spatial terms, that means higher sampling rate ( lots of infills requiring less assumptions ) and spatial consistency of the resource ,all of which reduce the requiement for blocking assumptions.

Of course, other factors also intervene , in the valuation process.
These include stripping ratio, location relative to infrastructure availability, mettalurigal characteristics , grade ( high grades means lower mining costs etc ).

In my view, VL compares very favorably and should at least meet , if not exceed peer requirements for $200 per oz.


The Leprechaun deposit mineralization starts near surface and is configured favourably for open pit mining, with mineralized intersections grading 4.43 g/t Au over 20.8 m and 2.78 g/t Au over 22 m at depths of less than 50 m below surface. Strip ratio ( waste to ore ) is therefore likley to be at or better than the norm.

Grades are very high , which is also very favorable and, along with a decent strip ratio , means lower than peer value cash costs.

The gold is coarse ,with up to 58 % being recovered by gravity alone, and over 90 % in combination with cynanide leach.....conventional milling is very favorable , which also is propitious for future u/g mining requirements.

And so on  for the orther rating variables.

Finally, VL  will be coveted , and a bidding war can be envisaged.
Mar's NewCo will need majority ownership of the VL resource in order to raise financing.
RIC is in dire need of a major new mine and there are several otrhers who might want to take us out.

My scenario...............a combination of cash plus equity sale of VL by MOA , with MOA continueing as an independent equity along with its two other major assets.






.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>