Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SINCHAO METALS CORP V.SMZ



TSXV:SMZ - Post by User

Post by smpipeon Sep 22, 2010 9:06pm
569 Views
Post# 17481613

Sinchao ?????????

Sinchao ?????????

Garbage is the indifference how that highrider avoids Maloney`s evidence (see Bullboard of AAG),

 

I confirmed that sinchao`s claims are islands, in figure 2, page 7

 

But in same sinchao`s NI 43-101 report  published on sedar 12/22/2008, see Table 1 in page 6. See column of owns,       Why “Sinchao Metals Corp” not own any claim?

 

Minera incognita, rita margot de Cajamarca, cleopatra de Cajamarca, carlos santolalla fernandez, viruca de Cajamarca, and the famous EL MISTI GOLD SAC (already sold by Andean).
 
Who are those guys? why own sinchao claims?


Tremendous lack of transparency

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>