Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Yukon Nevada Gold Corp T.YNG



TSX:YNG - Post by User

Comment by strelioffon Sep 25, 2010 5:04pm
231 Views
Post# 17492887

RE: YNG.WT traded at $0.15...

RE: YNG.WT traded at $0.15...macchubbz2
"They traded at
.15 when the stock was at
.28, why arent they trading higher whent he stock is now at
.76 currently. Does that make sense?"

Made perfect sense
Valuation which made warrant holders like myself forced to value the warrants without Ketza.
Extracting Ketza to form a NewCo is no longer as of YSM news release to drop "Tagish bid"..warrants of Yukon can now return to including Ketza river.
Positive Re-rating of warrants
Remember we were about to spend $ buying something we own and giving something we own away to a new company to spin out...that is no longer the case and that is why warrants were not going up as warrants are generally not owned by retail investors and therefore institutional investors were fine to sit until clarity was provided.


Personally pray they walk Tagish thru credit protection and we walk with the mineral rights.
Personally pray those 10-15 cent shares were sold by us and not just management

why the heck do we have to wait to get a re-rating in 2011 when we should have got one in 2010 when we went from non-producer to producer?
https://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22918.html
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>