Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Diamond Frank Exploration Inc V.DOD



TSXV:DOD - Post by User

Comment by Kits09on Oct 05, 2010 7:18pm
308 Views
Post# 17532447

RE: Since the annoucement

RE: Since the annoucementWould you be happy with 11.25g/t over 60m? That's equivalent to what they hit, except it's better over 6m (only 10% of the volume of rock to remove/transport/process).

The wrinkle with the Fayolle property is that, as far as we know, it holds a "jewellry box" type of deposit - rich pockets, not continuous lower grade seams. The key is to know where to drill. So, we may need to be prepared for mixed results - some holes with little showing and others which hit the rich "boxes". Here's hoping there are more of the latter.

Kits09    
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>