Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Comment by Cousin_Gerton Oct 12, 2010 12:03pm
206 Views
Post# 17554057

RE: RE: RE: RE: techically 1.00 plus should come t

RE: RE: RE: RE: techically 1.00 plus should come tI think you are both wrong about when MOA will move.

I have looked on the Drill map posted on MOA's web site at where the next drill results are coming from. I see a very high probability, due to their location in relation to the big hole hits from last winter's drill program where grades to 15 OZ/t where returned (yes big OZ's were being reported from here not little g's) and where there were numerous high grade hits over wide zones, that these next holes are going to be the icing on the cake well in advance of the 43-101. These last holes before the 43-101 could be reported as early as next week. I suggest you go to MOA's Web site and take a look yourself. Dig back and find the results from the holes in this same section that were reported in early 2010 and you will see what I mean. 

All on board now will benefit if what I see from the drill map comes in as expected. Waiting on the 43-101 time frame to secure your position could be a timing error....C.Gert
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>