Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF



GREY:TWNNF - Post by User

Comment by BGrahamon Oct 18, 2010 8:04pm
279 Views
Post# 17579658

RE: Moving West....

RE: Moving West....

Digger144;

You said,

"One thing of concern and I cannot really make any conclusions at this point is that they had to drill through a lot of rock before they hit mineralization in the new Sections, this may or may not turn out to be a problem I need more information."

What is it exactly that causes you consternation? I take it that if these are vertical holes then the mineralization starting at +200 meters below surface is a strong negative? Too much overburden over the conceptual pit?


The "heading" information you refer to - I guess these holes could have been drilled at a steep angle and result in the mineralization being closer to surface than it appears right now - is this what you are inferring based on limited info available?

BG
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>