RE: RE: "Clearly disappointing"Maybe that guy is a dork. Maybe he is concerned about the wrong thing, i.e., he is concerned about the company communicating with him and not the gold deposit.
Now if he said something material backed up with some facts, such as the gold deposits don't have potential, then I perk up and listen. He actually said they have potentially two major deposits or something to that effect. OK then, whatever else you have to say, I don't care. I like buying value at a discount. People complain about the share price, but not value. SLW was $2 in 2008. Was there something fundamentally wrong with the company? I say no. Instead, I say there was something fundamentally wrong with the shareholders puking up the shares for $2 out of some misguided fear. This appears to be the case here too.